| Projects |
| Foot & Ankle | Footwear | Hamstring Injury Prevention | OA | Therapeutic Interventions Affiliated Projects |
Footwear Design |
Current Projects | Completed Projects
Current Projects
Effect of Cleat Type on Unanticipated Cutting Kinematics on FieldTurf
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of three different types of cleats on lower extremity kinematics during two unanticipated cutting tasks on FieldTurf. This study will focus specifically on hip, knee, and ankle kinematics during the stance phase of a cutting maneuver. The goal of this study is to determine whether certain cleats allow players to maintain a more desirable position than the other cleats on Field Turf. The positions of the hip, knee, and ankle are important for injury prevention in sports that are played in cleats. We hypothesize that w
hile subjects are wearing the bladed cleat they will remain in a more favorable position for injury prevention.
hile subjects are wearing the bladed cleat they will remain in a more favorable position for injury prevention.This study is designed to determine the effect of different types of cleats on lower extremity kinematics during the stance phase of two different unanticipated cutting maneuvers being performed on FieldTurf. The three different types of cleats that will be tested are a Firm Ground Cleat (FG), Hard Ground cleat (HG), and a bladed cleat (BC). A total of 30 subjects, 15 male and 15 female will be tested. The men will need to wear between a size 9 and 11 shoe and the women will need to wear between a size 8 and 9. Subjects will have no history of lower extremity injuries in the past six months, no history of ACL reconstructive surgery within the past three years, will be physically active and play a competitive sport in which cleats are worn. Subjects who participate in some form of physical activity at least three times a week for approximately an hour each time will be considered to be physically active. Subjects who practice or play in games in which cleats of any kind are worn at least two times per week will be considered to be competitive athletes in a cleated sport.
A total of eight infrared cameras (Motion Analysis, Inc, Santa Rosa, CA) will be positioned around the FieldTurf field and will be used to record the trajectories of the retro-reflective markers, which will be placed on the subjects. A total of 32 markers will be placed on each subject at the following anatomic landmarks: left scapula, joint space between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae (L4-L5), bilaterally on the acromioclavicular joint, lateral epicondyle, wrist, anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), greater trochanter, lateral thigh, lateral femoral condyle, medial femoral condyle, anterior lower leg over the tibial ridge, lateral malleolus, medial malleolus, posterior, medial, and lateral heel, and toe. Following the placement of all of the markers, subjects will be asked to stand within the view of the cameras facing the direction they will be moving and a static standing trial will be recorded. Following the collection of the static standing trail, the four medial markers (medial femoral condyle, medial malleoli) will be removed and the subject will be ready to perform the cutting tasks.
The subjects will be asked to run straight ahead towards a set of 2 lights that will be on a table in front of them. They will be asked to run until they see one the lights come on and at that point they will cut either 45 degrees to the left or 45 degrees to the right. The path on which the subject’s should travel will be marked on the floor using tape so that they are truly cutting at the desired angle. The cutting order and shoe testing order will be randomized so that each time the subject approaches the light, they will not know which light will be illuminated. In addition, subjects will be asked to approach the light at a speed of approximately 6.0 m/s ± 5%, which will be monitored with a set of timing gates. In addition, the post cut speed with be monitored and recorded using a timing system. Participants will be asked to complete 5 acceptable cuts in each of the three shoe conditions and both of the cutting tasks. An acceptable cut will be defined as a cut in which the subject reaches the desired speed during the run up, performs a side-cut maneuver, and cuts in the appropriate direction based on which light is illuminated. Subjects will be given a 30 second rest between each trial and a five minute rest between each shoe condition.
Each subject will be allowed to practice each cutting task 3 times prior to the start of data collection. After the first shoe condition is completed the shoes will be changed, the medial markers and shoe markers will be placed on the subject again and another static standing trial will be recorded. Following the static standing trial the cutting tasks will be repeated again in a randomized order. Subjects will be asked to complete approximately 40 cutting tasks per session assuming that the subject has some trials which are unacceptable. Testing should take approximately 1 hour per subject.
Current Status:
Subjects are currently being recruited and tested for this study, with a goal of completion in the spring of 2009.
Effect of Different Running Shoes on Lower Extremity Kinematics, Kinetics, and In-shoe Pressure
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of two different types of running shoes on lower extremity kinematics, kinetic, and in-shoe pressure while subjects run at different speeds. This study focuses specifically on hip, knee, and ankle kinematics and kinetics as well as plantar pressure during the stance phase at different running speeds. The
goal of this study is to determine whether certain types of running shoes allow players to decrease plantar pressure and maintain more desirable position
ing of the hip, knee, and ankle while running. These factors have been linked to reducing lower leg injuries.
ing of the hip, knee, and ankle while running. These factors have been linked to reducing lower leg injuries. This study will compare athletic training shoes and racing flats. A total of 40 subjects, 20 male and 20 female subjects, will be tested. Subjects will range in age from 18-30 years and will be recruited by word of mouth and posted fliers. Subjects will have no history of lower extremity injuries in the past six months, no history of foot surgery within the
past 3 years, will be physically active and run at least 10 miles per week. Subjects who participate in some form of physical activity at least three times a week for approximately an hour each time will be considered to be physically active. After signing the informed consent, height, weight, foot length, and foot width will be recorded, to be used during data reduction. A total of eight infrared cameras (Motion Analysis, Inc, Santa Rosa, CA) will be positioned around the testing area and will be used to record the trajectories of the retro-reflective markers, which will be placed on the subjects. A total of 30 markers will be placed on each subject at the following anatomic landmarks: joint space between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae (L4-L5), lateral epicondyle, iliac crest, posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), greater trochanter, lateral thigh, lateral femoral condyle, medial femoral condyle, anterior lower leg over the tibial ridge, lateral malleolus, medial malleolus, toe, and posterior, superior, and lateral heel.
Following the placement of all of the markers, subjects will be asked to stand within the view of the cameras facing the direction they will be moving and a static standing trial will be recorded. Following the collection of the static standing trail, the four medial markers (medial femoral condyle, medial malleoli), and the iliac crest markers will be removed and the subject will be ready for the running trials. Participants will be asked to complete 7 acceptable trials at each speed for each shoe. Subjects will be asked to complete trials at 3.35m/s (8min/mile) as well as a comfortable running speed for each shoe condition. The running speed for each trial will be monitored using infrared photocells positioned approximately 6 meters apart. The standard speed will be useful for the direct comparison of the two shoe conditions; however, the self-selected speeds will allow for an examination of the effect of shoes on running speed as well as kinematics and kinetics. An acceptable trial will be defined as a trial in which the subject completes the indicated task and all of the markers are seen and the subject lands on the force plates as indicted. Subjects will be given a 30 second rest between each trial and a five minute rest between each shoe condition. The testing order for both shoes and running speeds will be randomized for each subject. After the first shoe condition is completed the shoes will be changed, the standing trial markers and shoe markers will be placed on the subject again and another static standing trial will be recorded. Following the static standing trial the testing will be repeated in a randomized order. Testing should take approximately 1 hour per subject.Publication Status:
Articles:
Johannes I. Wiegerinck, Jennifer Boyd, Jordan C. Yoder, Alicia N. Abbey, James A. Nunley, Robin M. Queen. Differences in Plantar Loading between Training Shoes and Racing Flats at a Self-Selected Running Speed. Gait and Posture (In Press)
Additional papers are still in preparation
Abstracts:
Robin M. Queen, Jordan C. Yoder, Johannes I. Wiegerinck, Jennifer Boyd, Alicia N Abbey, James A. Nunley. Plantar Loading differences between Racing Flats and Training Shoes at a Self-Selected Running Speed. North American Congress on Biomechanics, Ann Arbor, MI, 2008.
Robin M. Queen, Alicia N. Abbey, Johannes I. Wiegerinck, Jordan C. Yoder, James A. Nunley. Plantar Pressure Differences Between Genders When Comparing Racing Flats and Traditional Training Shoes. American College of Sports Medicine, Seattle, WA, 2009 (In Review)
Completed Projects
Cleat Deign and Plantar Loading Projects
The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in lower extremity kinematics that resulted from completing an agility course in four different cleats. In addition to examining the changes in mechanics between a hard ground cleat, firm ground cleat, bladed cleat, and a turf shoe, this study aimed to examine the differences in lower extremity mechanics between genders. Each subject was asked to run an agility course 5 times while their mechanics were recorded using a six camera motion analysis system. The agility course was designed so that the subjects had to go around a series of flags in a slalom type course. During testing the subjects were asked to complete the course in each of the four shoe conditions with a 2 minute rest between shoe conditions and a 30 second rest between trials.
Publications:
Articles:
Robin M. Queen, Brian L. Charnock, William E. Garrett, W. Mack Hardaker, Ershela L. Sims, Claude T. Moorman. A Comparison of Cleat Types During Two Soccer Specific Tasks on FieldTurf. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 42 (4): 278-284, 2008.
Ershela L. Sims, W. Mack Hardaker, Robin M. Queen. Gender Differences in Plantar Pressure Loading During Three Athletic Tasks. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 42 (4): 272-277, 2008
Robin M. Queen, Benjamin B. Haynes, W. Mack Hardaker, William E. Garrett, Jr. Forefoot Loading During Three Athletic Tasks. American Journal of Sports Medicine; 35(4): 630-636, 2007
Abstracts:
Robin M. Queen, Ershela L. Sims, Benjamin B. Haynes, William E Garrett, Jr. Differences in Forefoot Loading During Three Athletic Tasks on FieldTurf. American Society of Biomechanics Annual Meeting, Blacksburg, VA.
William E. Garrett, Jr, Claude T. Moorman, III, W. Mack Hardaker, Robin M. Queen. Plantar Pressure Differences between Cleat Plate Configurations During a Side-Cut Task on FieldTurf. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. Volume 38 (S5): 2006




DHTS STRATEGIC WEB SERVICES